Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Iowa Orthop J ; 40(1): 115-120, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32742218

RESUMO

Background: Some NCAA conferences now require a press box-based Medical Observer for all football games to identify injuries missed by on-field providers. The objective of this study was to determine whether a Medical Observer identified injuries missed by the on-field medical personnel. Methods: This was a comparative observational study of injury identification methods which was done at nine NCAA football games. The athletes on a single institution's varsity football team participated. Eight games and one bowl game were studied. Observers were sports medicine Fellows (Orthopaedic, Primary Care). Injury logs were kept by the Medical Observer to document game day injuries. The athletic training staff collected injury reports in the days following games. These were compared with game day injury logs to identify any injuries that were not reported to the medical staff during competition. Results: A total of 41 game injuries were identified (4.56 injuries/ game). 29 injuries (29/41; 71%) were identified by both the sideline medical providers and the Observer, 12 (12/41; 29%) were identified by only the sideline medical providers and no injuries were identified by only the Observer. A total of 95 game-related injuries were evaluated in the training room on the day after each game. 27 injuries (27/95; 28%) had been identified during the game (9 [33%] by the sideline medical team and 18 [67%] by both the sideline medical team and the Observer). Fourteen game injuries were not severe enough to require care the following day. There were 68 (68/95; 72%) delayed self-reported injuries treated by the training room staff the next day. Conclusions: A press box-based Medical Observer did not identify any injuries missed by the on-field medical staff. This study did, however, identify a large number of unreported game-day injuries that were treated the following day.Level of Evidence: II.


Assuntos
Pessoal Técnico de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos em Atletas/diagnóstico , Futebol Americano/lesões , Medicina Esportiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Universidades
2.
Cell Cycle ; 18(12): 1407-1421, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31130069

RESUMO

Heterochromatin Protein 1 α (HP1α) associates with members of the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) during mitosis, at centromeres where it is required for full Aurora Kinase B (AURKB) activity. Conversely, recent reports have identified AURKB as the major kinase responsible for phosphorylation of HP1α at Serine 92 (S92) during mitosis. Thus, the current study was designed to better understand the functional role of this posttranslationally modified form of HP1α. We find that S92-phosphorylated HP1α is generated in cells at early prophase, localizes to centromeres, and associates with regulators of chromosome stability, such as Inner Centromere Protein, INCENP. In mouse embryonic fibroblasts, HP1α knockout alone or reconstituted with a non-phosphorylatable (S92A) HP1α mutant results in mitotic chromosomal instability characterized by the formation of anaphase/telophase chromatin bridges and micronuclei. These effects are rescued by exogenous expression of wild type HP1α or a phosphomimetic (S92D) variant. Thus, the results from the current study extend our knowledge of the role of HP1α in chromosomal stability during mitosis.


Assuntos
Aurora Quinase B/metabolismo , Instabilidade Cromossômica , Proteínas Cromossômicas não Histona/metabolismo , Animais , Aurora Quinase B/antagonistas & inibidores , Homólogo 5 da Proteína Cromobox , Proteínas Cromossômicas não Histona/genética , Aberrações Cromossômicas , Células HeLa , Heterocromatina/metabolismo , Humanos , Cinetocoros/metabolismo , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Mitose , Fosforilação , Fosfosserina/metabolismo , Ligação Proteica , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia
3.
Phys Sportsmed ; 45(3): 265-270, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28679304

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether an online course would lead to increased knowledge about the medical issues volunteers encounter during a marathon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Health care professionals who volunteered to provide medical coverage for an annual marathon were eligible for the study. Demographic information about medical volunteers including profession, specialty, education level and number of marathons they had volunteered for was collected. A 15-question test about the most commonly encountered medical issues was created by the authors and administered before and after the volunteers took the online educational course and compared to a pilot study the previous year. RESULTS: Seventy-four subjects completed the pre-test. Those who participated in the pilot study last year (N = 15) had pre-test scores that were an average of 2.4 points higher than those who did not (mean ranks: pilot study = 51.6 vs. non-pilot = 33.9, p = 0.004). Of the 74 subjects who completed the pre-test, 54 also completed the post-test. The overall post-pre mean score difference was 3.8 ± 2.7 (t = 10.5 df = 53 p < 0.001). While subjects with all levels of volunteer experience demonstrated improvement, only change among first time marathon volunteers was significantly different from the others. Subjects reporting all degree/certification levels demonstrated improvement, but no difference in improvement was found between degree/certification levels. CONCLUSION: In this follow-up to the previous year's pilot study, online education demonstrated a long-term (one-year) increase in test scores. Testing also continued to show short-term improvement in post-course test scores, compared to pre-course test scores. In general, marathon medical volunteers who had no volunteer experience demonstrated greater improvement than those who had prior volunteer experience.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Corrida/lesões , Corrida/fisiologia , Voluntários/educação , Certificação , Escolaridade , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Humanos , Internet , Projetos Piloto
6.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 12(6): 381-90, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24225523

RESUMO

Professional football is one of the most popular sports in the United States. There is a common constellation of injuries that are seen frequently. Much attention has been focused on concussions and their long-term outcomes in this population. Other common causes of morbidity include cervical spine injuries, knee injuries including anterior cruciate ligament and other ligamentous injuries, ankle sprains, and medical issues including cardiac and sickle trait. Several recent studies have focused on hip impingement and hamstring injuries, among others, as sources of missed playing time as well. This review describes some of the frequently seen injuries and medical issues in professional football players. Proper management of both medical disease and on-field injuries can reduce morbidity and may lead to faster return to play and reduced risk of future injury.


Assuntos
Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Futebol Americano/lesões , Futebol Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/prevenção & controle , Concussão Encefálica/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...